To What End High School?

Wednesday, 17 February 2010 20:49 by Eli Savit

Today's New York Times feature an article about a new program that will allow high school sophomores to test out of 11th and 12th grade and enroll early in community college.   Although the program's initial scope is limited--just dozens of high schools in eight states will participate--its backers hope that the early community college option will eventually be open to high school students across the country.  One proponent argues that early community college enrollment will help "those who [feel] by the ages of 16 or 17 like they have somewhere better to be."

Now, high schools often do a poor job holding students' interest, but it strikes me as dangerous to let bored 15 and 16 year olds enroll in community college rather than continue on an advanced college prep course.  A 15-year-old might honestly believe that she wants no part in college.   She might honestly believe that she wants to be done with school and to move on with her life.  But if we let that 15-year-old  eschew the final years of high school to enroll in career training, she might never have the opportunity to take that life-changing chemistry or AP US History class that will ultimately spark her passion and set her on the path to college.

Calls for a de-emphasis of college and an increased emphasis on vocational training have been ascendant of late, but this program, oddly, targets the top students--those who are able to pass a battery of tests at the end of 10th grade.  We might quibble as to whether it's a good idea to track some students into vocational programs (I'm looking at you, Charles Murray), but even if we do think that too many students are going to college, this program targets at least some students who are college-ready.  And, by dangling the opportunity to get an associate's degree in two years, we risk putting some of these college-ready kids on the wrong career path.  

If high schools are boring students--and many of them are--it's probably time to examine the 11th and 12th grade curriculum itself.  High schools should probably offer a broader mixture of vocational opportunities and college prep courses.  If high schools can't afford to offer those programs on their own dime, students should be able to enroll in high school and community college simultaneously.  And it's time to take a long, hard look at why students feel so bored in school--if conventional classes are boring students, they probably need to be overhauled.  But ultimately, we do high school students no favors by allowing them to make a potentially rash decision about their future after a bare demonstration of minimal academic competence.

Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Currently rated 1.7 by 34 people

  • Currently 1.705882/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , , , , , ,
Categories:   News
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (1) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

No, NBC, I Do Not Want A Scott's Tots T-Shirt

Monday, 7 December 2009 03:55 by Eli Savit

Let's call it like it is: The Office has sucked for a while now.  Mostly, this is because its writers have stopped trying to make jokes, and instead constantly try to put Jim and Pam into adorable situations.  There are exactly 3.5 funny characters on the show now: KevinStanley, the Nard Dog, and Dwight--50% of the time.

Still, The Office has usually remained watchable.  To use a basketball analogy: watching The Office this year has been like watching Michael Jordan when he played for the Washington Wizards.  Neither Wizards Jordan nor the 2009 Office lived up to their potential. Both were shadows of their former selves. Still, Wizards Jordan and the 2009 Office were usually worth watching for the nostalgia and occasional flashes of brilliance.   

This week, though, The Office officially crossed into Iverson-with-the-Pistons territory: painful to watch, toxic, and utterly tone deaf.  For those of you who didn't catch it, the story centered around a promise that Michael Scott (the boss) had made ten years earlier to a group of  poor African-American third graders.  Michael--who was visiting the classroom for some reason or another1--told the kids, in the heat of the moment, that he would pay their college tuition if they graduated from high school.

One problem: Michael didn't have the money.  And instead of a) establishing a trust, b) 'fessing up to his mistake when the students were in, oh, fourth grade, or c) trying to secure some financial aid for the kids, Michael chose to d) do nothing.  Of course, he still let the class to celebrate him as a hero.  The kids wore "Scott's Tots" T-shirts.  They looked up to Michael as a mentor.  Michael's fake-o promise apparently changed the way they lived: the kids worked hard, got involved in extracurricular activities, and allowed themselves to dream big dreams.  And then, during their senior year of high school, they invited Michael to their school to show them all that they had accomplished--and to thank him for their forthcoming scholarships.

Remember, The Office is nominally a comedy, so this is all one big comedic set-up.  "Surely, this will provide some guffaws," the tone-deaf hacks over in The Office's creative department must have said to one another.  "You see, it will be awkward!  They'll be celebrating his generosity, and he'll have to tell them that he can't fulfill his promise!"  

And so the episode sets up this supposedly "comedic" tension. Michael Scott walks into the school.  He is greeted by a bubbly young girl who shares with him her love of music and her  dreams of college.  A troop of the students perform a dance for Michael, chanting "whatchu gonna do, make our dreams come true."  An earnest, ambitious young man gives a speech in which he thanks Michael for giving him the opportunity to be "the next President Obama."  Michael sits there, watching the ebullient enthusiasm of fifteen young people whose lives he is about to shatter, and that is supposed to be funny.  Because it is awkward.  Or something. 

Fail.  Fail fail fail fail fail.  I know that The Office has long thrived on putting its characters in awkward situations (Season 1's Diversity Day is one of the funniest episodes of any TV show, ever), but this one was just mean-spirited.  Awkwardness is funny sometimes, but there comes a point past which it's funny anymore.  More awkward does not mean more funny.  For example: it would surely have been far more awkward if, instead of sitting there quietly listening to the kids's speech, Michael had punched the music-loving girl in the head, set up a waterboarding facility right there in the room, and tortured her while screaming "blow this through your tuba!" in front of the teenagers who had idolized him five minutes earlier.  But that would have been even less funny than the actual episode. 

So there are limits to how much humor you can get from awkwardness.   I have proved this point with a graph that I made using the most sophisticated of technology:

 

 In any case, after all that painful awkwardness, we get to the comedic climax: Michael gives a speech in which he tells the kids he's not giving them college scholarships, but hands out laptop batteries instead.  Our reaction, I suppose, is supposed to be "Oh Michael! LOLOLOLOL! That is too much!  What are they going to do with laptop batteries--they can't even afford a computer!"  The comedic focal point, of course, is supposed to be Michael.  He made a buffoon out of himself again! He tried to make things better but didn't!  How like Michael Scott to completely bumble the situation!

Personally, though, I can't see why anybody would be focusing on Michael at this point in the show.  We saw the kids, we saw their excitement and optimism--and then we saw Michael Scott shatter their dreams.  But the writers of the episode apparently wanted us to think of the kids as nothing but comedic collateral damage.  We were supposed to just disregard the fact that fifteen kids who worked hard and did everything right would have to go home that afternoon and say "hey Mom, it turns out I'm not going to be able to afford Penn after all," or "hey Grandma, is there any way you can sell your car to help pay for my college?"  Our comedic focal point, after all, is Michael.  Laptop batteries!  Ha!

Part of what made The Office funny was that its most awkward moments always came in situations that we really didn't care about.  When Michael screwed up diversity training by pretending to be Martin Luther King, that was funny, because most of us don't think office-mandated diversity training is all that important.  When Michael made an idiot out of himself at an awards banquet for top salespeople, nobody cared--again, because we don't attach any real importance to showy sales conferences.  But Michael screwing over fifteen underprivileged kids is different.  The upper-class, Ivy-league educated creative forces behind The Office might think that nobody really cares about what happens to poor kids, but many of us do, and many of us think that the promises we make to our kids are important.  

It doesn't disturb me so much that the writers had a bad idea.  What disturbs me is that The Office creative team, its editors, and the NBC brass all apparently thought nothing wrong with this episode.  They wrote it, they produced it, it aired--suggesting that these folks really thought most of their audience would find the episode funny.  

In fact, NBC must have thought it was a particularly hilarious episode, because they are currently hawking  brand-new "Scott's Tots" tee shirts in the NBC store.  That's right, for $25, you can buy a T-shirt just like those worn by the kids that aren't going to college anymore!  This t-shirt screams "I thought the episode about Michael Scott breaking his promise to a group of poor black kids was HILARIOUS!"  You can wear it with your scarlet letter jacket or whatever other pieces of clothing you might own that shows you enjoy the suffering of fictional characters.  

I'll pass on the t-shirt.  And if you're looking for a better way to spend your $25, remember that every single gift on The Generation Project site is pre-funded--you put your money down upfront, and we fulfill your vision when a student or educator claims it.  

Here at The Generation Project, we still think that promises made to our children are no laughing matters.


1. To be fair, I am sure that third graders find lectures by middle management in paper companies absolutely riveting.   

Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Currently rated 5.0 by 5 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , , , ,
Categories:   News
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (2) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

On Campus: Student Leader Reception at the University of Michigan

Friday, 20 November 2009 15:21 by Megan O'Rourke
Editor's Note: Across the country, college students are embracing our model for change and are taking action to help us revolutionize educational philanthropy.  At the University of Michigan, a group of committed students formed an official campus group to reach out to the campus community and college students at large.  This special guest post was written by one of The Generation Project's Michigan student group leaders.

 

Last night, The Generation Project and the TGP Student Group at the University of Michigan hosted a Student Leader Reception on campus. The event was a huge success and we got the chance to meet with more than 30 student leaders representing some of the most influential and prominent organizations at U of M.  The Generation Project's co-founders, Jessica Rauch and Eli Savit, spoke about the organization's mission and its model, which was followed by a short presentation from leaders of the TGP Student Group.  

Not only were guests uniformly enthusiastic and attentive throughout the presentations, but they lent their creativity to design a gift to be implemented at a school in Detroit!  Students split off into groups and designed gifts worth $100 each, then engaged in a "voice vote" to decide the winning gift.  Thanks to an anonymous donor, the winning gift will be implemented in a Detroit school this year.

Thank you so much to the students who attended the event. We appreciate your support and look forward to working with you in the coming semester!

To see the winning Student Leader gift, login and check out its gift page!

Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Currently rated 1.9 by 34 people

  • Currently 1.911765/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , , ,
Categories:   Campus Student Groups | Detroit
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

On Unithrive and Personal Connections

Friday, 19 June 2009 18:37 by Eli Savit

We try not to blog too much about our competitors in the philanthropic "industry" over here at The Generation Project, because:
a) writing really nice things about other worthy charities out there might convince you to use your philanthropic dollars elsewhere, and that's not a great business model; and,
b) writing really mean things about other charities out there ("The Red Cross is wack, yo!") is cold-hearted and wrong.1

That said, we thought that the recent New York Times feature on Unithrive.org warranted some comment. Unithrive is a new organization that allows alumni of certain universities to make interest-free loans ranging from $50 to $2000 to students who attend their alma mater.  As the Times points out, Unithrive's potential appeal derives from the fact that "alumni will have a personal connection to current students."  That whole "personal connection" thing is all the rave in the non-profit world these days--check out, for example, Kiva.org, or this really cool educational charity that gives you complete creative control over your donation dollars

What makes Unithrive different--and what I believe will ultimately make it so attractive--is that lenders through their site essentially have a double layer of personal connections.  Not only are Unithrive lenders helping out unique, discrete human beings, they are helping out a unique, discrete human beings who attend their alma mater.  And people already give money to their alma maters in droves.  Acccording to Giving USA, the vast majority of education-related charitable giving in the United States is earmarked for colleges and universities.  Because personal connections are such a magnetic force in charitable giving, I have no doubt that Unithrive will be a great success.

I do hope, though, that Unithrive will rethink its model slightly, and allow its lenders to give to students regardless of whether they attend their alma mater.  Although I'd imagine that most lenders will still earmark loans for students that attended their college or university, Unithrive could also potentially serve as a site for, say, a Harvard-educated lender to make a personal connection with a struggling student at Berea College.  Personal connections are the driving force of philanthropy, but innovative organizations like Unithrive should seek to boldly forge new  connections, not simply piggyback upon those that already exist.  My sneaking suspicion is that people with money often give to their alma maters precisely because they are the only charitable organizations to which they feel a personal connections, but perhaps people can find a more meaningful experience--and get more bang for their their philanthropic bucks--if they are aware of the many worthy causes out there. 

On a related note, Greg Easterbrook--whose Tuesday Morning Quarterback column is one of the great pleasures of football season--has written great stuff on the absurdity of people giving to universities that have massive endowments, while many smaller, languishing colleges and universities struggle for adequate funding.  I'll simply close this post with a link to his thoughts on the matter, provocatively titled: Rich people, stop giving to Harvard! 

 


1. For the record, our official position is that you should give liberally, to whatever causes you choose, and we hope that you choose to give to high-need K-12 students, through us.
Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , , , ,
Categories:   News
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed