On Curling and Literacy

Thursday, 26 March 2009 16:12 by Eli Savit

Huge news out of the curling world! Canada has reached the 3-versus-4 Page playoff at world women's curling championship!  But it wasn't all easy:

Against Ott, Jones was cruising with a 6-1 lead through four ends, but gave up two points in the fifth and another three in the seventh as the Swiss skip trimmed the lead to 7-6. The teams traded singles over the next two ends, and Ott (6-5) put Jones in a tough spot in the 10th, sitting two stones on the button. Jones ran one of her own rocks into the Swiss pair with her final shot, and spun them far enough away to lie the game-winning point.

If you're not a curling fan, you're probably a bit confused by all this.  What, after all, does it mean to have a  "6-1 lead through four ends?"  Or to run "one of her own rocks into the Swiss pair?" And who in the heck is "Ott?" But your failure to understand the preceding paragraph probably does not mean that you are illiterate, or  that your reading comprehension is subpar.   Instead, it simply betrays your lack of knowledge about the ostensible subject matter of this blog post: curling.  In fact, you probably know all the words that are used in the preceding paragraph ("rocks," "ends" "skip") you just don't know what they mean in this pariticular context.

This very simple point--that you need to know what you're reading about in order to really understand it--has been made again, and again, and again by the philosopher/educational theorist E.D. Hirsch.  And in light of President Obama's call for “assessments that don’t simply measure whether students can fill in a bubble on a test," Hirsch strikes a similar tone in his recent New York Times op-ed, Reading Test Dummies.

The crux of Hirsch's argument is that schools have responded to the incentives tied to standardized reading tests by teaching reading as a skill.  Because teachers never know what the subject matter of the actual passages on the reading tests are going to be--they could be on curling, baseball, the Constitution, or butterfies--teachers spend their time teaching students "skills" like "making inferences" or "finding the main idea."  But, Hirsch argues, reading is not "merely a 'skill' that can be transferred from one passage to another...[and] reading scores [cannot] be raised by having young students endlessly practice strategies on trivial stories."  To truly raise a generation of literate citizens, Hirsch argues, we need to reform standards and tests so that they reward the teaching of substantive knowledge: science, history, geography, and so forth.

Hirsch's point is an important and a good one.  Reading "skills" only go so far, and an overreliance on teaching literacy in a vacuum threatens to create a generation of students who aren't very literate in any meaningful sense.  A child might be able to "identify the main idea" and understand all the words in an article about the Supreme Court, but if they have no idea what the Supreme Court does or how it functions, they are not going to understand that article any more than those uninitated in curling can understand the passage above.  Just as bad, overemphasis on reading as a skill strips reading of some of its joy.  Think about it: are you reading this blog post right now because you think that "making inferences" is fun?  Because you like "finding the main idea?"  No, more likely, you're reading it because you are interested in the subject matter of this post, and you probably have some background knowledge in the topic.  But teaching a generation of kids that reading is simply about skills and not about content risks undermining the very fun of diving into a book, article or blog post about a topic that's interesting. 

If literacy is the ultimate end to be achieved, then we as educators, philanthropists and citizens would do well to focus our attention not just on reading qua reading, but also on things like the arts, social studies, science, and so forth.  Giving kids the background knowledge to understand a wide range of texts is critical, and teaching kids about stuff will give them the motivation to read about subjects they find interesting.  That's why recent cutbacks in history, geography, arts, and so forth are ultimately so counterproductive.  Indeed, as Hirsch points out, this de-emphasis on teaching content in favor of teaching skills may, ironically, explain why test scores have stayed flat despite tremendous investment of money and instructional time in reading qua reading.


Comprehension test:
What was the main idea of this blog post? 
A) Curling is a complicated sport
B) E.D. Hirsch is a philosopher and educational theorist
C) Reading is more than just a skill
D) Students who do not know how the Supreme Court functions do not understand newspaper articles
Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Currently rated 2.0 by 28 people

  • Currently 1.964286/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , ,
Categories:   News
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Memories of Madness

Thursday, 19 March 2009 10:42 by Eli Savit

Editor's Note: Be forewarned: this rather lengthy piece has more than a touch of memoir to it.  If you are looking for a quick way to help The Generation Project, PLEASE vote for us on Rugby.com here.  If you are looking for in-depth sports analysis, you're obviously in the wrong place.

Happy Tournament Tip-Off Day.  For sports fans, it really doesn't get any better than this.  From noon today through Sunday night, we'll be treated to 48 first and second round NCAA tournament games, and all the action, upsets and buzzer-beaters those games inevitably entail.  By the end of the weekend, brackets will be busted, one or two Cinderella teams will likely be ascendant, and the number of contenders for the Division I men's basketball championship will be whittled down from 64 to 16.

For as far back as I can remember, the start of the tournament has been my Christmas morning.  I grew up as a rabid sports fan in the sports-crazed university town of Ann Arbor, Michigan, and my elementary school years coincided with the arrival at the University of Michigan of five fabulous basketball-playing freshmen.  Even after the Fab Five left town, and Michigan's basketball program seemingly fell off the face of the Earth, I still loved watching the tournament.  I was a basketball player myself, the tournament was an opportunity to watch the game played at its highest amateur level, by players not much older than myself. The passion with which college basketball players compete in March is unparallelled, and the games are a joy to watch for any fan of athletics.

As I look back on March Madnesses past, though, I can only remember a few specific games, a few specific runs through the tournament, a few specific Cinderella stories.  (George Mason immediately comes to mind).  My strongest memories from March are gathering with a group of close friends, a bunch of unhealthy food, and settling in to watch game after game after game on the opening weekend.  For much of my scholastic career, these friends--and thus, my tournament-watching companions--were my teammates on whatever school basketball team I was playing on at the moment: middle school, high school, college. 

Those of you who participated in competitive athletics know what I'm talking about: for months on end, you spend hours a day with your teammates.  You are with them in practice, at games, on the team bus, in film sessions, in the weight room.  On longer trips or tournaments, you might stay in hotels with them, four to a room, playing cards, shooting the breeze, goofing off past bed check and on until four in the morning.  And all this time together is the compulsory stuff, the stuff that's a necessary condition to being on the team.   But at the end of the day--past the end of practice--you often don't leave your teammates.  Maybe you'll stay in the gym afterwards, shooting H-O-R-S-E or making trick shots.  Maybe you'll head over to your point guard's house, raid his parents' well-stocked fridge for Gatorades, and watch TV in the basement.  Maybe you'll just sit around on a bench outside school, talking about basketball, school, girls, whatever. More...

Currently rated 2.7 by 9 people

  • Currently 2.666667/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , ,
Categories:   News
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Pilot Program Update: Donors Share The Gift of Reading

Monday, 16 March 2009 15:55 by Eli Savit

As former educators, we here at The Generation Project are ashamed to admit that we were unaware until recently that March is National Reading Month.1  My own excuse is that I was always distracted by the fact that March is also National Screw Up Your Bracket By Picking Notre Dame To Go To The Final Four Month. 

Having discovered that March is National Reading Month, though, we thought we would take the opportunity to feature two reading-related gifts that donors have recently implemented through The Generation Project's pilot program. For those of you who don't know, our pilot program has been implementing a limited number of donor-designed gifts  in Detroit and New York City schools in advance of our official launch, and two of the March gifts implemented through the pilot program explicitly shared with students the gift of reading:

Amber Hermosillo--Gift of American Girl Books (Implemented in Mr. Piekara's Sixth Grade Class, Bronx, NY):
Growing up, Amber's favorite books were those in the American Girl historical fiction series. Because those particular books sparked Amber's passion for reading, she decided to purchase a complete set of American Girl books for a high-need urban classroom.  Amber's gift was implemented in Evan Piekara's sixth grade classroom at I.S. 162 in the Bronx.  Judging from the photographs that Mr. Piekara sent to us, it seems clear that there are a number of young readers in his class that share Amber's love of these particular books--and will hopefully go on to share Amber's lifelong love of reading.  Photographs of Amber and the kids, in montage form, below:

Duffy Fitzpatrick--Gift of Magic Tree House Books (Implemented at Wayne Elementary School, Detroit, MI):
When Duffy's son was in elementary school, she read through the Magic Tree House book series with him.  The series--which follows the time-traveling adventures of a brother-and-sister duo--teaches children about both literacy and history.  Having seen how her own son loved gravitated towards these books, Duffy decided to donate two full boxed sets of Magic Tree House books through The Generation Project.  Duffy's gift was implemented at Wayne Elementary School in Detroit.  Watch the video below to see how three third grade students think about reading--and why they are looking forward to the Magic Tree House books:

Both Amber and Duffy's gifts speak to a real need in many American schools.  It is virtually undisputed that reading is absolutely key to academic success--but students will never develop a love of reading if they aren't exposed to books that capture their attention and their imagination.  And, unfortunately, many schools simply don't have enough textual diversity in school or classroom libraries.  That's where donor-led philanthropy can come in: most people that love reading can name certain books that grabbed their attention growing up, and chances are, there's a kid out there who's going to gravitate towards those same books as well.  Donating a book, or a set of books, is an inexpensive way to make a personal and profound diffference in kids' lives.

Happy Reading Month from The Generation Project.


1. An interesting sidenote--National Reading Month does not start until March SECOND, because that is Dr. Suess's Birthday.  I personally think this is awesome. 
Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Currently rated 1.8 by 32 people

  • Currently 1.8125/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , , , , , ,
Categories:   Detroit | New York | News | Schools | Shameless Pleas for Support
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Ivan Guzman: Earmark Hypocrisy, Cramer on The Daily Show, and My Search For Young Republican Moderates

Sunday, 15 March 2009 08:13 by Ivan Guzman

Editor's Note: By giving donors complete creative control over gifts geared towards high-need K-12 students, The Generation Project hopes to facilitate personal connection between donors and the kids they are helping.  As part of that effort, we are letting some of the students that we hope to affect to use this blog to write about their lives, their schools, and anything else they find interesting. Our hope is that, by posting kids' own words, we can give you, the donor, some insight into the interests and passions of the students you would be affecting with your gifts. To highlight the kids' own words, their posts are uncensored and unedited and represent the views of the kids and adolescents that authored them, NOT The Generation Project. 

This post was written by Ivan Guzman, a 15-year-old from the Bronx.  Read more about Ivan here:

I never thought I would write about the economy, and I'm not going to, exactly. I am going to write about some things that came about due to the economy. Like hypocritical Republicans like Lindsey Graham (I'll explain why he's hypocritical later, it's called a tease people) and Jim Cramer's appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. I'm also going to write about a McCain that I actually look forward to seeing more of (it's obviously not John because America doesn't want to see more of him, my proof is the 2008 election).

First, the hypocritical Republicans. Republicans' opposition to the stimulus was all about spending. They were not happy with the amount of earmarks in the bill. Yet when the bill passed and they lost, they decided to add in some earmarks of their own. One of those Republicans who did not surprise me was Lindsey Graham from South Carolina. I'm sure Graham would tell anyone his political career has been dedicated to outlawing earmarks yet he was one of the first to add to the many earmarks in the bill. After the first couple of days no one but MSNBC pointed this out (but then again MSNBC points out everything Republicans do wrong). That was until Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri pointed this out in a speech on the Senate floor. President Obama followed this up by scolding Republican hypocrisy also. Big ups to Senator McCaskill and Prez Obama!

Second, I was watching the Rachel Maddow Show (an EXCELLENT show) when Rachel mentioned she would have John McCain's daughter Meghan would be on the show. I thought 3 things:
1. WOW!! A Republican
2. What possible reason could she have for being on a liberal network?
3.She's probably lost.
It turns out she wasn't lost. In fact, she was there because she kind of takes exception to the message that Ann Coulter delivers in her books and other things. I was as shocked as you are (that last sentence will only work if you're shocked.....or if anyone is reading this). The hits keep coming though. Ms. McCain is a moderate Republican, she's actually willing to listen to liberals! As a liberal who's willing to listen I found that to be a breath of fresh air. Funny thing about young Republicans, I've never come across one. I'm almost convinced they don't exist other than Meghan McCain. I would like to hear more from her and not people who are just going to put their foot in their mouth whenever they go off-message (you hear that, MICHAEL STEELE?)

My thoughts on Jon Stewart and Jim Cramer and my Ann Coulter nickname contest, after the jump. More...

Currently rated 1.7 by 105 people

  • Currently 1.676191/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , , , , , , , , ,
Categories:   New York | News | Student Bloggers
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (3) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

New Rugby Competition Voting Procedure

Thursday, 12 March 2009 19:42 by Jessica Rauch

Thanks so much to those of you who have supported The Generation Project over the last week in Ralph Lauren Rugby's $25,000 grant competition. As always, we are blown away by your support.

Today, Rugby tweaked the voting procedure slightly.  In order for your vote to count, we now need people to vote by going to the siteclicking the box to the left of our name and pressing "submit."  Previously, as many of you know, Rugby had you vote by posting a comment to the blog entry.  This system makes it even easier to support us by taking out that pesky typing requirement.

Screenshot?  Aye, screenshot:

Thank for your continued support...and know that this grant, if we are lucky enough to receive it, will go a long way towards helping us expand educational opportunities for students who desperately need them.

Digg It!DZone It!StumbleUponTechnoratiRedditDel.icio.usNewsVineFurlBlinkList

Currently rated 1.9 by 19 people

  • Currently 1.894736/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tags:   , ,
Categories:   Grants | Shameless Pleas for Support
Actions:   E-mail | del.icio.us | Share on Facebook | Permalink | Comments (2) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed